Tom Brady has been fired up all season and it was on display after his one yard touchdown run. (AP Photo/Brandon Wade) Notes and Observations Week 5: Patriots Defense Solid After the Bye Week; Beat Dallas 30-6 Screen Shot 2015-10-12 at 4.38.52 PM Bruins Continue Slump, Lose 3rd Straight to Start 2015-2016 brady sack Cowboys Defense Gave Patriots’ Offensive Line All It Could Handle Is it time to rely on Philip Rivers to lead your fantasy team? Fantasy Football Start ‘Em, Sit ‘Em: Week 5, 2015

David Ortiz not Joining Rangers, Agrees to 2-Year Contract with Red Sox

David Ortiz (Photo by Darren McCollester/Getty Images)

Rumors early in the day Friday had the Rangers very intrigued by David Ortiz. It made sense too. They have a habit of signing veterans to fill their DH slot over the last several years, with names like Sammy Sosa and Vladimir Guerrero doing the honors. So, what would stop Big Papi from extending his career with the Rangers?

Well, that’s because he extended his career at least two years with the Red Sox. Friday night, the Sox and Ortiz reached agreement on a two-year deal worth $26 million, with another $4 million possible in incentives.

Ortiz, who will turn 37 before the season, had a great year until he got hurt (and according to Bobby Valentine, quit on his team). He hit .318/.415/.611 with 23 home runs and 60 RBI in 90 games.

Good deal for both sides? Good deal for just Ortiz? What do you think?

About KC Downey - @kc_downey

KC is the "head coach" of the Sports of Boston, LLC blog network. Follow him on Twitter: @kc_downey

Tags: , ,


2 comments for “David Ortiz not Joining Rangers, Agrees to 2-Year Contract with Red Sox”

  1. Good things that he stays, he is a crowd favorite and the other free agents don’t look all that good. Might be an overpay but they can afford it.

    Posted by Martin | November 3, 2012, 11:37 am
  2. @Martin – Totally agreed. I think it’s the right thing to do, and now that they have the money, I’m glad they got it done early.

    Posted by KC Downey | November 3, 2012, 12:14 pm

Post a comment