Connelly’s Top Ten: Celts play hard, Sox who cares, Crazy Brothers Cleveland Cavaliers forward LeBron James pulls up his sleeve while facing the Boston Celtics in the first quarter of a first-round NBA playoff basketball game in Boston, Thursday, April 23, 2015. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa) Another Hard-Fought Loss: Celtics Lose 103-95, Go Down 3-0 in Series After celebrating their 4th Super Bowl victory, it's back to work for the New England Patriots. (credit Getty Images) 2015 New England Patriots Schedule and Predictions Rick Porcello was taken deep twice on Sunday moving his total to 5 home runs allowed on the season. (AP Photo/Steven Senne) Red Sox Weekly Round Up: Starting Pitchers Post League Worst ERA

Celtics, Knicks Talking Amar’e Stoudemire Trade?

Amar'e Stoudemire

Reportedly, the Knicks would like to trade Amar’e Stoudemire. The Celtics, in return, would send Kris Humphries and Gerald Wallace to New York. Humphries has not played much this season, while Stoudemire shows there is little difference between how he stands on and off the court. This trade is a spade for a spade. Spades that are worthless.

Fallen Cities

How far have the Boston Celtics and New York Knicks fallen? Answer: very far. I watch the Celtics, I scratch my head, make a multitude of faces — my heart breaks. It is just not the same. Boston took the heart of their team (Paul Pierce, Kevin Garnett) and sent them to Brooklyn. Then, I look over at the Knicks. I think back to days of Patrick Ewing. Remember when the Knicks were an impressive team? Now it seems there is an air of desperation among the front office and on the court. The same could be said of the Celtics. Now the two teams want to meet like two middle schoolers with crappy trading card collections to see if they can make a deal. Both need to off-load bad contracts, but the only trouble is the other has nothing to offer.

The Spades

I understand the Knicks want to get rid of Stoudemire. He’s a bit old for today’s game. Truly the problem for both clubs is that they would like to reinvest their money in other players. In this trade scenario, no one gets anything different, or better, than they already have on their respective rosters. This is a waste of time (and words). Stoudemire and Wallace are the same age. Wallace is a liability, because he has a mouth on him, and he’s just moving the ball around. Humphries is an add-on, an afterthought of a bargaining chip to the Knicks. I’m sure the Celtics must feel like they made a mistake in picking him up in the first place. Why on Earth did the Celts take on Humphries? The only place he had game was with Kim Kardashian, and we all saw how that worked out. He didn’t have a shot with her and neither does he have one with Boston. I would happily be rid of him. Have you seen Humphries play? He is far too tentative in my opinion. He looks like a lost puppy on the court.

Stoudemire, Wallace and Humphries are all the same. The Knicks are desperate to move Stoudemire and the same desperation is felt in the front office in Boston. Let’s just return to our corners, keep the devils we know, and wait for a better opportunity.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Discussion

No comments for “Celtics, Knicks Talking Amar’e Stoudemire Trade?”

Post a comment